Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 6, 2015 at 8:55 am in reply to: Suggestion to use standard labeling nomenclature for left hand #3204
I have to agree with Navdeep, Ritchie. It is confusing. I guess you don’t want more numbers near the tab numbers. Still, it is confusing. Also, the word “pinkie” is not universal in English. It’s actually a Scots word, transported to the USA. Many English people don’t know what it is, although they are learning 🙂
Just one more thing, Robert. Your fingering for pattern 7 differs from Ritchie’s. He has the upper octave 6th on the second string, while you have it on the third. Just thought I’d better mention it.
Robert, why do you play the 5th on string three instead of string two in the first diagram?
You should remove the 6th on the first string from the arpeggio in the 4th diagram.
Cheers, Ken.
How did you do it? I don’t know why I’m appearing as “Mr”, when I never wrote that.
Thanks, Navdeep. That makes more sense to me. So far I’m just doing mixolydian modes and V7 arpeggios, no Dorian or Ionian modes, but I can see how they fit into the system.
I’m on module 1, and can’t remember when I joined. Does a window open saying your next module is available? Or do you have to keep looking?
Navdeep, thanks for this. I understand most of it.
I get the first part: In the key of G, for example, use the first pattern for the ii chord. Then at the same fret, 5th string, use the 4th pattern for the V chord. Then at the same fret, 4th string, use the 7th pattern for the I chord. Hence, ii, V, I.
But then you do to the iii chord – why? Why iii IV vi vii?
And are you still playing Dom 7th arpeggios and mixolydian modes, or a different mode or major/minor/diminished for each chord of the key?
Are you thinking this pertains to Module 1 or higher?
Thanks for the replies. I’m not sure, Ritchie, if you said it outright, or just implied it. Or I inferred it. There was definitely something written or on video saying something along the lines of: look at these before starting module 1. I seem to have took that to mean you must learn all this first.
As I don’t seem to be the only one who wondered about it, it perhaps needs a little clarification.Best wishes to all,
Rob
-
AuthorPosts